Korean Clinical Psychology Association

Current Issue

Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology - Vol. 40, No. 3

[ Original Article ]
Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology - Vol. 40, No. 2, pp.115-129
Abbreviation: KJCP
ISSN: 1229-0335 (Print) 2733-4538 (Online)
Print publication date 30 May 2021
Received 16 Oct 2020 Revised 02 Mar 2021 Accepted 03 Mar 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2021.40.2.001

초기 성인기 사회불안 수준에 따른 자기 참조적 주의편향 및 기억편향에서의 차이
김다선1, 2 ; 이종선2,
1연세대학교 의과대학 세브란스병원 소아심리실
2강원대학교 심리학과

Differences Between Self-Referential Attention Bias and Memory Bias According to Early Adult Social Anxiety Levels
Dasun Kim1, 2 ; Jong-Sun Lee2,
1Department of Pediatric Psychology at Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Psychology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
Correspondence to : Jong-Sun Lee, Kangwon National University, 1 Gangwondaehak-ro, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea; E-mail: jongsunlee@kangwon.ac.kr

© 2021 Korean Clinical Psychology Association
Funding Information ▼


본 연구에서는 자기 참조적 주의편향과 기억편향이 사회불안 수준에 따라 차이를 보이는지 살펴보았다. 성인 참가자 110명은 고사회불안, 중간사회불안, 저사회불안, 건강 집단으로 구분되었다. 주의편향은 공간단서과제, 기억편향은 출처감찰과제를 사용하여 탐색되었다. 과제의 자극 참조조건은 나, 타인이 보는 나 및 타인의 세 대상을 제시하였다 주의편향은 연구의 관심에 따라 후기 주의 과정의 주의 탈개입 편향 점수(DBS)를 사용했다. 기억편향은 출처감찰 패러다임 수식 중 학습 단어 출처 판단 정확 능력을 측정하는 출처변별 정확률(CSIM)과 비학습 단어의 출처 추측을 측정한 추측 지표(g)를 사용했다. 그 결과, 고사회불안 집단은 건강 집단과 달리 타인이 보는 나 참조조건에서 부정 자극으로부터 주의 탈개입에 어려움을 보였다. 기억편향에서는 중간사회불안 집단이 건강 집단보다 타인 참조조건의 긍정 자극에 대한 출처 변별 정확률이 높게 나타났다(CSIM). 이는 해당 자극에서 주의 회피 경향을 보였던 건강 집단과 달리 중간사회불안 집단은 어떠한 주의편향도 나타내지 않았던 결과를 반영하는 것임을 시사한다. 자기 참조조건을 도입하여 사회불안 집단의 주의와 기억 처리 과정의 관계에 대한 본 연구 결과의 임상적 의의를 논의하였다.


The present study aimed to investigate self-referential attention bias and memory bias according to social anxiety levels in early adulthood. Participants (N=110) were divided into four groups: high social anxiety (HSA), middle social anxiety (MSA), low social anxiety (LSA), and healthy control (HC). Attention bias was measured using spatial cueing task, and memory bias was measured using a source monitoring task. Stimuli of the tasks were presented under three conditions for the tasks: self-reference (SR1), perception of self by others (SR2), and other-reference (OR). Disengagement bias scores (DBS) were used as an attention bias. Conditional Source Identification Measure (CSIM) was used to measure the ability to recognize the source of the words learned and guess indicator (g) was used to measure the ability to guess the source of words not learned. According to the attention task results, the HSA group had difficulty disengaging attention (DBS) from negative stimuli at SR2 compared to the HC group. In the memory task, the MSA group showed higher accuracy for positive stimulus of OR than the HC group (CSIM). This reflects the result that, unlike the HC group that avoided positive stimulus of OR, the MSA group showed no attention bias. The clinical significance of the findings in this study on the relationship between attention and memory processing in social anxiety groups was discussed by introducing self-referential conditions.

Keywords: social anxiety, self-referential attention bias, self-referential memory bias, spatial cueing task, source monitoring task
키워드: 사회불안, 자기 참조적 주의편향, 자기 참조적 기억편향, 공간단서과제, 출처감찰과제


This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2018R1C1B5043272).

Author contributions statement

DSK, a graduate student at Kangwon National University, who is now a clinical psychology intern in the Department of Pediatric Psychology at Severance Hospital, analyzed data, and led manuscript preparation, contributed to conception and design, conducted data collection and analysis, and drafted the manuscript.

JSL, an associate professor at Kangwon National University, served as the principal investigator of the research grant and supervised all the research process. All authors provided critical feedback, participated in the revision of the manuscript and approved the final submission.

1. Abraham, A., Kaufmann, C., Redlich, R., Hermann, A., Stark, R., Stevens, S., & Hermann, C. (2013). Self-referential and anxietyrelevant information processing in subclinical social anxiety: an fMRI study. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 7, 35-48.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publication.
3. Amir, N., Elias, J., Klumpp, H., & Przeworski, A. (2003). Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1325-1335.
4. Asmundson, G. J., & Stein, M. B. (1994). Selective processing of social threat in patients with generalized social phobia: Evaluation using a dot-probe paradigm. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 8, 107-117.
5. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548.
6. Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. V., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C. L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 480-500.
7. Beck, A. T. (1996). Beyond belief: A theory of modes, personality, and psychopathology. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (p. 1-25). New York: The Guilford Press.
8. Bell, R., Mieth, L., & Buchner, A. (2020). Source attributions for detected new items: Persistent evidence for schematic guessing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1407-1422.
9. Boehme, S., Ritter, V., Tefikow, S., Stangier, U., Strauss, B., Miltner, W. H., & Straube, T. (2015). Neural correlates of emotional interference in social anxiety disorder. PLoS One, 10, e0128608.
10. Buckner, J. D., Maner, J. K., & Schmidt, N. B. (2010). Difficulty disengaging attention from social threat in social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 99-105.
11. Chen, N. T., Clarke, P. J., MacLeod, C., & Guastella, A. J. (2012). Biased attentional processing of positive stimuli in social anxiety disorder: An eye movement study. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 41, 96-107.
12. Choi, S. E., & Choi, H. S. (2014). Effects of visual perspectives and construal level on Social Anxiety. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 283-301.
13. Chon, K. K., Choi, S. C., & Yang, B. C. (2001). Integrated adaptation of CES - D in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 59-76.
14. Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 203-216.
15. Clark, D. M., & McManus, F. (2002). Information processing in social phobia. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 92-100.
16. Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. Social phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment, 41, 22-23.
17. Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 261.
18. Conway, M. A., Singer, J. A., & Tagini, A. (2004). The self and autobiographical memory: Correspondence and coherence. Social Cognition, 22, 491-529.
19. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
20. Danneel, S., Nelemans, S., Spithoven, A., Bastin, M., Bijttebier, P., Colpin, H., . . . Goossens, L. (2019). Internalizing problems in adolescence: Linking loneliness, social anxiety symptoms, and depressive symptoms over time. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47, 1691-1705.
21. D’Argembeau, A., Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Laureys, S., Del Fiore, G., Degueldre, C., . . . Salmon, E. (2005). Self-referential reflective activity and its relationship with rest: A PET study. Neuroimage, 25, 616-624.
22. Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681.
23. Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 459-473.
24. Gamble, A. L., & Rapee, R. M. (2010). The time-course of attention to emotional faces in social phobia. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 39-44.
25. Gotlib, I. H., Krasnoperova, E., Yue, D. N., & Joormann, J. (2004). Attentional biases for negative interpersonal stimuli in clinical depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 127.
26. Gutchess, A., & Kensinger, E. A. (2018). Shared mechanisms may support mnemonic benefits from self-referencing and emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 712-724.
27. Hirsch, C. R., & Clark, D. M. (2004). Information-processing bias in social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 799-825.
28. Hong, Y., & Cho, H. (2010). Review of the cognitive model of Social Phobia and empirical research. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorder, 26, 293-316.
29. Hong, J. P., Lee, D. W., Ham, B. J., Lee, S. H., Sung, S. J., & Yoon, T. (2017). The survey of mental disorders in Korea (MOHW Publication No. 11-1352000-000564-13). Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare. Retrieved from http://www.mohw.go.kr/upload/viewer/skin/doc.html?fn=1493191278238_20170426162121.pdf&rs=/upload/viewer/result/202105/
30. Jang, H. B., & Lee, J. S. (2020). Do effects of Attention Bias Modification training depend on Working Memory capacity for social anxiety symptoms? Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 242-256.
31. Jeon, H. J., & Lee, H. J. (2017). The self and other representations and self-focus attributes of college students with social anxiety with concerns for offending others. Clinical Psychology in Korea: Research and Practice, 3, 67-94.
32. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3.
33. Kalenzaga, S., & Jouhaud, V. (2018). The self-reference effect in memory: An implicit way to assess affective self-representations in social anxiety. Memory, 26, 894-903.
34. Kashdan, T. B. (2007). Social anxiety spectrum and diminished positive experiences:Theoretical synthesis and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 27, 348-365.
35. Kim, J. Y., Lee, H. J., & Park, S. J. (2018). The relationship between negative interpretation of positive evaluation and social anxiety. Clinical Psychology in Korea: Research and Practice, 4, 157-186.
36. Kim, H. K., Ahn, J. K., & Kwon, J. H. (2015). Do images of the self affect the retrieval of autobiographical memories? Clinical Pychology in Korea: Research and Practice, 1, 21-41.
37. Kim, M. J., & Cho, H. J. (2015). Cognitive processes of the social anxiety group after Social Performance Anxiety: degree of Postevent processing. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 20, 329-346.
38. Kim, K. M., & Yi, D. J. (2010). Self-positivity bias in self-referential source memory. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 24, 47-61.
39. Koo, H. J., & Kwon, J. H. (2015). Attentional bias in social anxiety : Differential effect of threat-induced engagement, disengagement and avoidance. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 707-746.
40. Koo, K. S., & Koo, H. J. (2019). The relationship between Internalized Shame and social anxiety: The mediating effects of Interpretation Bias of positive social events. Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Korea, 19, 505-524.
41. Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641-669.
42. LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155-184.
43. Lee, J. Y., & Choi, J. H. (1997). A study of the reliability and the validity of the Korean versions of Social Phobia Scales (K-SAD, KFNE). Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16, 251-264.
44. Lee, J. D., & Lee, H. J. (2017a). Differences in Source-monitoring task performance based on levels of negative automatic thoughts. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 630-641.
45. Lee, J. D., & Lee, H. J. (2017b). An overview of Source monitoring: Concept, assessment, and Schema Bias. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 36, 397-420.
46. LeMoult, J., & Joormann, J. (2012). Attention and Memory Biases in social anxiety disorder: The role of comorbid depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36, 47-57.
47. Libby, L. K., & Eibach, R. P. (2002). Looking back in time: self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 167.
48. Mansell, W., & Clark, D. M. (1999). How do I appear to others? Social anxiety and processing of the observable self. Behaviour research and therapy, 37, 419-434.
49. Mansell, W., Clark, D. M., Ehlers, A., & Chen, Y. P. (1999). Social anxiety and attention away from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 673-690.
50. Mitte, K. (2008). Memory bias for threatening information in anxiety and anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 886.
51. Mogg, K., Philippot, P., & Bradley, B. P. (2004). Selective attention to angry faces in clinical social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 160.
52. Moriya, J., & Tanno, Y. (2007). Attentional disengagement from socially threatening stimuli in social anxiety. The Japanese Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 123-131.
53. Oh, K. J., & Yang, Y. R., (2003). Psychological mechanism associated with the development and maintenance of social anxiety in adolescence 2: A 6 month follow-up study. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 577-597.
54. Pilkonis, P. A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1979). The personal and social dynamics of shyness. Emotions in Personality and Psychopathology, 131-160.
55. Pishyar, R., Harris, L. M., & Menzies, R. G. (2004). Attentional bias for words and faces in social anxiety. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 1, 23-36.
56. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
57. Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 741-756.
58. Rodebaugh, T. L. (2009). Social phobia and perceived friendship quality. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 872-878.
59. Sanz, J. (1996). Memory biases in social anxiety and depression. Cognition & Emotion, 10, 87-106.
60. Shin, M. H., & Hyun, M. H. (2007). Time-course of attentional bias for threatening stimulus in Anxiety-prone individual. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 26, 207-223.
61. Silvia, P. J., Allan, W. D., Beauchamp, D. L., Maschauer, E. L., & Workman, J. O. (2006). Biased recognition of happy facial expressions in social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 585-602.
62. Sim, H. J., & Kweon, H. S., (2013). The relation between childhood interpersonal trauma exposure and social anxiety in college students: The mediating effect of internalized shames. Korea Journal of Counseling, 14, 3709-3722.
63. Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage, R. M., & McDowell, N. K. (2003). Portrait of the self-enhancer: Well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 165.
64. Vassilopoulos, S. P. (2005). Social anxiety and the vigilance-avoidance pattern of attentional processing. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 33, 13.
65. Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448.
66. Weeks, J. W. (2010). The disqualification of positive social outcomes scale: A novel assessment of a long-recognized cognitive tendency in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 856-865.
67. Weeks, J. W., Heimberg, R. G., Rodebaugh, T. L., & Norton, P. J. (2008). Exploring the relationship between fear of positive evaluation and social anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 386-400.
68. Yeung, R. C., & Fernandes, M. A. (2019). Social anxiety enhances recognition of task-irrelevant threat words. Acta Psychologica, 194, 69-76.
69. Yoon, H. Y., & Kwon, J. H. (2013). The efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder:changes in the attentional bias and the implicit self-esteem. Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Korea, 13, 211-234.
70. Young, J. E. (1990). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Sarasota. FL: Professional Resource Exchange, Inc.