Korean Clinical Psychology Association

Current Issue

Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology - Vol. 39 , No. 3

[ Original Article ]
Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology - Vol. 39 , No. 3 , pp.215-230
ISSN: 2733-4538 (Online)
publication date 30 Aug 2020
Received 21 Jan 2020 Revised 01 Jun 2020 Accepted 03 Jun 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2020.39.3.002

강박성 성격장애 경향군의 대인관계 문제 및 변동성: 대인관계 원형모델을 바탕으로
이지은 ; 임종민 ; 장문선
경북대학교 심리학과

Interpersonal Problems and Variability of Individuals with Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder Tendencies: Focusing on the Interpersonal Circumplex
Jieun Lee ; Jongmin Lim ; Mun-Seon Chang
Department of Psychology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
Correspondence to : Mun-Seon Chang, Department of Psychology, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu, Korea; E-mail: moonsun@knu.ac.kr

© 2020 Korean Clinical Psychology Association


강박성 성격장애는 대인관계 통제 욕구로 인해 경직되고 완강한 대인관계 양상을 보이며 타인과 친밀한 관계를 맺는 것에 어려움을 나타낸다(APA, 2013). 대인관계 기능이 성격병리를 이해하는데 핵심 요소임에도 불구하고, 강박성 성격장애의 대인관계 문제나 대인관계 경직성을 살핀 선행연구는 매우 드물다. 이에 본 연구는 권위(Agency)와 친화(Communion)라는 두 차원으로 대인관계 요소를 측정하는 대인관계 원형모델(Leary, 1957)을 바탕으로 강박성 성격장애 경향군의 주된 대인관계 문제와 대인관계 행동 및 사회적 지각에서의 변동성을 살펴보았다. 특히, 강박성 성격장애가 권위를 바탕으로 타인과 관계를 맺는다는 점을 감안하여, 대상(친구와 권위자)에 따라 행동 및 지각에서의 변동성이 어떻게 달라지는지 비교하였다. 또 강박성 성격장애가 자기애성 성격장애와 자주 공병한다는 점을 고려하여, 자기애성 성격특성을 공변인으로 통제했다. 연구 결과, 통제집단은 대상에 따른 행동과 지각 변동성의 차이가 유의하지 않았다. 반면, 강박성 성격장애 경향군은 동료를 대할 때보다 권위자를 대할 때 행동의 범위가 줄어들었고, 특히 권위 차원에서 경직된 대인관계 행동 양상을 보였다. 아울러, 강박성 성격장애 경향군의 권위와 관련된 행동 변동성은 자기애성 성격특성을 통제했을 경우에 더 감소했는데, 이는 강박성 성격장애가 자기애성 성격장애에 비해 권위 차원에서 더 경직된 행동 패턴을 보임을 간접적으로 시사한다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 결과를 바탕으로 강박성 성격장애군에 대한 상담 및 치료에서의 시사점을 논의하였다.


The core feature of Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) is based on a desire for mental and interpersonal control, which leads to rigidity, stubbornness, and difficulties in maintaining an intimate relationship (APA, 2013). This study aimed to investigate prototypical interpersonal problems and behavioral and perceptual intraindividual variability in OCPD, based on the Interpersonal Circumplex (IPC; Leary, 1957). Participants (N=226) responded to PDQ-4+, KIIP-SC, behavioral response options, and an interpersonal grid with interpersonal scenarios. As OCPDs relate to others based on status and power, this study measured behavioral and perceptual intraindividual variability in relationships with friends and authority figures, respectively. In addition, the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) scores were controlled for, as previous studies have suggested that OCPD individuals reported similar interpersonal problems on the IPC with NPD individuals. The results showed that behavioral range and agency variability in individuals with OCPD tendencies decreased in relationships with authority figures compared to those with friends. Furthermore, their behavioral variability in agency decreased more when NPD scores were controlled for in relationships with authority figures, which suggests that OCPD is characterized by a rigid behavioral pattern when it comes to agency.

Keywords: obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, interpersonal circumplex, interpersonal problems, intraindividual variability
키워드: 강박성 성격장애, 대인관계 원형모델, 대인관계 문제, 개인내적 변동성


This paper is based on a part of the master’s thesis of the first author.

Author contributions statement

J Lee, graduate student at Kyungpook National University, collected and analyzed data, and led manuscript preparation. J Lim, lecturer at Kyungpook National University, analyzed data and assisted in manuscript preparation. M Chang, professor at Kyungpook National University, collected data and supervised the research process. All authors designed this study, provided critical feedback, participated in revision of the manuscript, and approved the final submission.

1. Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521-536.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
4. Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part I: a review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 332-346.
5. Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392-425.
6. Benjamin, L. S. (1996). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders (2nd ed). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
7. Cain, N. M. (2011, March). Interpersonal problem profile of the pathological obsessive-compulsive personality scale (POPS). Paper presented at the 2011 annual meeting of the Society for Personality Assessment, Boston, Massachusetts.
8. Cain, N. M., Ansell, E. B., Simpson, H. B., & Pinto, A. (2015). Interpersonal functioning in obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 90-99.
9. Carson, R. C. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
10. Eisen, J. L., Coles, M. E., Shea, M. T., Pagano, M. E., Stout, R. L., Yen, S., ... Rasmussen, S. A. (2006). Clarifying the convergence between obsessive compulsive personality disorder criteria and obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20, 294-305.
11. Erickson, T. M., Newman, M. G., & Pincus, A. L. (2009). Predicting unpredictability: Do measures of interpersonal rigidity/flexibility and distress predict intraindividual variability in social perceptions and behavior? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 893-912.
12. Fenichel, O. (1945). The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. New York, NY: Norton.
13. Fossati, A., Maffei, C., Bagnato, M., Donati, D., Donini, M., Fiorilli, M., ... Ansoldi, M. (1998). Brief communication: Criterion validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+(PDQ-4+) in a mixed psychiatric sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12, 172-178.
14. Gifford, R. (1991). Mapping nonverbal behavior on the interpersonal circle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 279-288.
15. Gurtman, M. B., & Balakrishnan, J. D. (1998). Circular measurement redux: The analysis and interpretation of interpersonal circle profiles. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 344-360.
16. Gurtman, M. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). The circumplex model: Methods and research applications. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.). Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 407-428). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
17. Halmi, K. A., Tozzi, F., Thornton, L. M., Crow, S., Fichter, M. M., Kaplan, A. S., ... Mitchell, J. E. (2005). The relation among perfectionism, obsessive‐compulsive personality disorder and obsessive‐compulsive disorder in individuals with eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 371-374.
18. Hong, S. H., Park, E. Y., Kim, Y. H., Kwon, J. H., Cho, Y. R., & Kim, Y. K. (2002). Short form of the Korean Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex scales(KIIP-SC). Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 923-940.
19. Hopwood, C. J., Ansell, E. B., Pincus, A. L., Wright, A. G. C., Lukowitsky, M. R., & Roche, M. J. (2011). The circumplex structure of interpersonal sensitivities. Journal of Personality, 79, 707-740.
20. Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G., Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 270-295.
21. Hunt, C., & Andrews, G. (1992). Measuring personality disorder: The use of self-report questionnaires. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 125-133.
22. Hyler, S. E. (1994). Personality diagnostic questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+). New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
23. Kiesler, D. J. (1985). The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: Acts version. Unpublished manuscript.
24. Kiesler, D. J. (1987). Check List of Psychotherapy Transactions-Revised (CLOPT-R) and Check List of Interpersonal Transactions-Revised (CLOIT-R). Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.
25. Kim, D. I., Choi, M. R., & Cho, E. C. (2000). The preliminary study of reliability and validity on the Korean version of personality disorder questionnaire-4+(PDQ-4+). Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 39, 525-538.
26. Kim, Y. H., & Hong, S. H. (1999). Standardization study of interpersonal assessment instruments: the inventory of interpersonal problems and its circumplex scale. Journal of the Sungkok Academic & Cultural Foundation, 30, 537-594.
27. Klein, M. H., Benjamin, L. S., Rosenfeld, R., Treece, C., Husted, J., & Greist, J. H. (1993). The Wisconsin personality disorders inventory: Development, reliability, and validity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 7, 285-303.
28. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
29. Lukowitsky, M. R., & Pincus, A. L. (2011). The pantheoretical nature of mental representations and their ability to predict interpersonal adjustment in a nonclinical sample. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 28, 48-74.
30. Mardia, K. V. (1972). Statistics of directional data. New York, NY: Academic Press.
31. Marissen, M. A., Deen, M. L., & Franken, I. H. (2012). Disturbed emotion recognition in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 198, 269-273.
32. McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28-50.
33. McLemore, C. W., & Benjamin, L. S. (1979). Whatever happened to interpersonal diagnosis? A psychosocial alternative to DSM-III. American Psychologist, 34, 17.
34. McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35. Millon, T. (1969). Modern psychopathology: A biosocial approach to maladaptive learning and functioning. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
36. Millon, T. (1981). Disorders of personality: DSM-III, Axis II. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
37. Millon, T. (1999). Personality-Guided Therapy. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
38. Millon, T., Grossman, S., Millon, C., Meagher, S., & Ramnath, R. (2004). Personality disorders in modern life (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
39. Millon, T., & Grossman, S. D. (2005). Personology: a theory based on evolutionary concepts. In M. F. Lenzenweger & J. F. Clarkin (Eds.). Major Theories of Personality Disorder (2nd ed.). (pp. 380). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
40. Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2005). Assessing interpersonal perceptions using the interpersonal grid. Psychological Assessment, 17, 218-230.
41. Pincus, A. L. (2011). Some comments on nomology, diagnostic process, and narcissistic personality disorder in the DSM-5 proposal for personality and personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 41-53.
42. Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2012). Interpersonal theory of personality. In I. B. Weiner, H. Tennen & J. Suls (Eds.). Handbook of Psychology Vol. 5: Personality and social psychology. (2nd Ed., pp. 141-159). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
43. Pincus, A. L., & Hopwood, C. J. (2012). A contemporary interpersonal model of personality pathology and personality disorder. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Personality Disorders (pp. 372-398). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
44. Pincus, A. L., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Interpersonal problems and conceptions of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 342-352.
45. Pincus, A. L., & Wright, A. G. (2011). Interpersonal diagnosis of psychopathology. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology (pp. 359-382). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
46. Rosenwald, G. C. (1972). Effectiveness of defenses against anal impulse arousal. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 292-298.
47. Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry : Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
48. Salzer, S., Pincus, A. L., Hoyer, J., Kreische, R., Leichsenring, F., & Leibling, E. (2008). Interpersonal subtypes within generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 292-299.
49. Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2010). A comparison of obsessive–compulsive personality disorder scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 232-240.
50. Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Conscientiousness and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 161-174.
51. Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., ... Siever, L. J. (2011). Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 136-169.
52. Skodol, A. E., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., ... Oldham, J. M. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 4-22.
53. Sullivan, H. S. (1953a). Conceptions of modern psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
54. Sullivan, H. S. (1953b). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
55. Villemarette-Pittman, N. R., Stanford, M. S., Greve, K. W., Houston, R. J., & Mathias, C. W. (2004). Obsessive—compulsive personality disorder and behavioral disinhibition. The Journal of Psychology, 138, 5-22.
56. Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.). Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl, Vol. 2. Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89-113). Minneapolis, MN, US: University of Minnesota Press.
57. Williams, T. F., & Simms, L. J. (2016). Personality disorder models and their coverage of interpersonal problems. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 15-27.
58. Wright, A. G. C., Pincus, A. L., Conroy, D. E., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2009). Integrating methods to optimize circumplex description and comparison of groups. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 311-322.
59. Wright, A. G. C., Pincus, A. L., Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 19, 263-275.
60. Zimmermann, J., & Wright, A. G. C. (2017). Beyond description in interpersonal construct validation: methodological advances in the circumplex structural summary approach. Assessment, 24, 3-23.