Korean Clinical Psychology Association

Current Issue

Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology - Vol. 38 , No. 3

[ Original Article ]
Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology - Vol. 38 , No. 3 , pp.275-286
ISSN: 2466-197X (Online)
publication date 31 Aug 2019
Received 19 May 2019 Revised 21 Jul 2019 Accepted 13 Aug 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2019.38.3.001

중용과 정신건강 및 심리적 유연성의 관계
안도연 ; 이훈진s
서울대학교 심리학과

The Relationships between Zhongyong, Mental Health, and Psychological Flexibility
Doyoun An ; Hoon-Jin Lee
Department of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to : Hoon-Jin Lee, Department of Psychology, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea; E-mail: hjlee83@snu.ac.kr

© 2019 Korean Clinical Psychology Association


본 연구에서는 한국인의 의식과 행동에 여전히 많은 영향을 미치고 있는 유학의 개념 중 일상성과 실천성이 높은 중용(中庸)을 심리학적으로 연구하였다. 중용 개념의 실용적 적용을 위한 실증적 연구로서의 기반을 마련하고자 중용과 정신건강의 관계를 탐구하였고, 유사 개념으로 볼 수 있는 심리적 유연성과의 차별점을 비교분석하였다. 중용은 상황을 잘 파악하여 적절한 행동을 취하고(시중[時中]), 상황의 전체를 고려하여 극단에 치우치지 않으려고 하며(불편불의[不偏不倚]), 타인에 대해 열려 있고 다른 것을 관용하는(역지사지[易地思之]) 태도로 구성되어 있어, 중용적 태도가 높을수록 정신건강 및 대인관계 측면에서 적응적인 기능을 할 것으로 예상하였다. 이를 검증하기 위해 대학생 364명을 대상으로 중용적 태도와 자존감, 정신적 웰빙, 대인관계 효능감, 우울, 불안, 경계선 성격과 같은 적응적 및 부적응적 변인과의 관계를 살펴보았다. 그 결과 중용적 태도는 우울 및 불안, 경계선 성격성향과 같은 부적응적 변인들과는 부적 상관이, 자존감, 정신적 웰빙 및 대인관계 유능성과 같은 적응적 변인들과는 정적 상관이 나타났다. 더불어 유사한 측면을 담고 있는 심리적 유연성과의 비교를 통해 중용적 태도가 특질 불안, 경계선 성격, 자존감, 정신적 웰빙에서 추가적인 설명력이 있음을 발견하였고, 특히 대인관계 유능성에서 중용적 태도의 추가 설명력이 상대적으로 더 많이 있음을 밝혔다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 의의 및 추후 요구되는 연구 주제에 대해 논의하였다.


In this study, the relationships between the practical Confucian virtue of Zhongyong (Doctrine of the Mean), mental health, and psychological flexibility were investigated. Zhongyong consists of three aspects: understanding the situations and taking appropriate action or optimal response (timeliness and harmony); not being biased and going toward the extreme (dynamic balance and equilibrium); and being open to and tolerant of others (empathy). This study was designed to examine the relationships between the Zhongyong attitude and various positive/negative psychological variables (depression, anxiety, borderline personality traits, self-esteem, well-being, psychological flexibility, and interpersonal competence) with the participation of 364 college students. The results indicated that Zhongyong was significantly correlated with lower levels of depression, anxiety, and borderline personality traits and higher levels of self-esteem, well-being, and interpersonal competence. In particular, the Zhongyong attitude had a stronger effect on interpersonal competence than psychological flexibility. Finally, the implications and limitations of this study and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Keywords: Zhongyong, mental health, psychological flexibility, interpersonal relationships
키워드: 중용, 심리적 건강, 심리적 유연성, 대인관계


This paper is a revision of a part of the first author’s doctoral dissertations from Seoul National University.

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder-5th edition (DSM-5). Washington, DC: Author..
2. An, D. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2016). Psychological construct of Zhongyong (Doctrine of the Mean): A preliminary study. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 35, 283-300..
3. An, D. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2017). Development and validation of the Zhongyong Questionnaire. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 36, 421-440..
4. An, D. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2018). Relationship between Zhongyong and emotion regulation. Unpublished raw data..
5. An, D. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2019). Development and effects of the Zhongyong Attitude Cultivating Program. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 38, 127-163..
6. Bae, S. W., & Shin, W. S. (2005). The factor structure of the CES-D Scale (The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale): An application of confirmatory factor analysis. Health and Social Science, 18, 165-190..
7. Beck, A. T., Brown, G. K., Steer, R. A., Kuyken, W., & Grisham, J. (2001). Psychometric propersites of the Beck Self-esteem scales. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 115-124..
8. Bond, F., Hayes, C., Baer, R., Carpenter, K., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H., . . . Zettle, R. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676-688..
9. Buhrmester, D., Furman, W., Wittenberg, M. T., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 991-1008..
10. Chiu, C. (2000). Assessment of Zhong-yong (dialectic) thinking: Preliminary findings from a cross-regional study. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences, 18, 33-55..
11. Cho, Y. (2007) Assessing emotion dysregulation: Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 1015-1038..
12. Choi, H. J. (2018). Evidence for Dialectical Behavior Therapy and dissemination in Korea: A systematic review. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 443-463..
13. Chon, K. K., Choi, S. C., & Yang, B. C. (2001). Integrated adaptation of CES-D in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 59-76..
14. Chou, L., Chu, C., Yeh, H., & Chen, J. (2014). Work stress and employee well-being: The critical role of Zhong-Yong. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 115-127..
15. Endler, N. S., & Kocovski, N. L. (2001). State and trait anxiety revisited. Anxiety Disorders, 15, 231-245..
16. Gallup Korea. (2015). The religion of Koreans 1984-2014. Seoul: Gallup Korea..
17. Glenn, C. R., & Klonsky, E. D. (2009). Emotion dysregulation as a core feature of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 20-28..
18. Gould, E. R., Tarbox, J., & Coyne, L. (2018). Evaluating the effects of acceptance and commitment training on the overt behavior of parents of children with autism. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 7, 81-88..
19. Han, N. R., & Lee, D. G. (2010). Validation of the Korean version of the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire in Korean college students. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 22, 137-156..
20. Hahn, D. W., Lee, C. H., & Tak, J. K. (1993). A study for the standardization of the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory. Journal of Student Guidance, 10, 214-222..
21. Hayes, S. (2002). Buddhism and acceptance and commitment therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 58-66..
22. Hayes, S. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639-665..
23. Hayes, S., Luoma, J., Bond, F., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1-25..
24. Heo, J. H., Choi, M. S., & Jin, H. J. (2009). Study on the reliability and validity of Korean Translated Acceptance-Action Questionnaire-II. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 21, 861-878..
25. Hong, S. H., & Kim, Y. H. (1998). A validation study of the borderline personality disorder scale in Korean university students. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17, 259-271..
26. Huang, C. L., Lin, Y. C., & Yang, C. F. (2012). Revision of the ZhongYong Belief-Value Scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 38, 3-41..
27. Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 28, 64-80..
28. Kashdan, T., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 865-878..
29. Kernberg, O. (2008). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism (Yoon, S.Y., Trans). Seoul, Korea: Hakjisa. (Original work published 1975. NY: Jason Aronson, Inc.)..
30. Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Complete mental health: An agenda for the 21st century. In C. L. M. Keyes, & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived (pp. 293-312). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press..
31. Keyes, C. L. M., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology and Psyhotherapy, 15, 181-192..
32. Kolubinski, D. C., Marino, C., Nikčević, A. V., & Spada, M. M. (2019). A metacognitive model of self-esteem. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 42-53..
33. Kim, H. E., & Park, K. (2014). The effects of process variables in acceptance commitment therapy for women’s depression. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 429-458..
34. Kim, J. T. (1978). A study based on the standardization of the STAI for Korea. The New Medical Journal, 21, 69-75..
35. Kim, S. J. (2018). Relation between depression/anxiety and emotion regulation choice: Role of affective flexibility. Clinical Psychology in Korea: Research and Practice, 4, 211-237..
36. Kim, Y. Y. (2011). Zhong Yong: Nature, dao, and education. Seoul: Tongnamu..
37. Lee, E. K., & Song, M. K. (2018). Effectiveness of ACT-based group counseling for depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 30, 635-661..
38. Lee, H. J., & Won, H. T. (1995). An exploratory study of the relationship between paranoid tendency, self-concept and self-consciousness. Paper presented at the 95’ Annual Conference of the Korean Psychological Association, Seoul..
39. Lee, J., Kwak, H. W., Lee, S., & Chang, M. S. (2013). Emotion regulation in young adults with borderline personality traits: Focusing on inhibitory functions for emotional stimuli, emotional hyper-reactivity, and emotional dysregulation. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 543-565..
40. Lee, J. Y., & Kwon, S. M. (2009). The relationship between emotion disorders and emotion regulation strategies. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 245-261..
41. Lee, S. A., & Kwon, S. M. (2017). Self regulation and psychological disorders: A review of the empirical literature. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 36, 1-37..
42. Lee, S. W. (1997). A Psychological Approach of Zhongyong. Paper presented at the 97’ Annual Conference of the Korean Psychological Association, Seoul..
43. Lim, Y. J., Ko, Y. G., Shin, H. C., & Cho, Y. R. (2012). Psychometric Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHCSF) in South Koreans. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 31, 369-386..
44. Min, B. B. (2015). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Workshop. Seoul: Maumsarang Institute for Cognitive and Behavioral Therapies..
45. Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. (2011). 2010 Family Survey. Retrieved from http://www.mogef.go.kr/mp/pcd /mp_pcd_ s001d.do?mid=plc503..
46. Muto, T., Hayes, S., & Jeffcoat, T. (2011). The effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy bibliotherapy for enhancing the psychological health of Japanese college students living abroad. Behavior Therapy, 42, 323-335..
47. Pan, W., & Sun, L. (2018). A self-regulation model of Zhong Yong thinking and employee adaptive performance. Management and Organization Review, 14, 135-159..
48. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimmel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 13, 435-468..
49. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401..
50. Rahim, M. A. (1983). A Measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368-376..
51. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press..
52. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Reviews Psychology, 52, 141-166..
53. Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 373-386..
54. Shin, A. Y., & Chae, J. H. (2011). Emotion regulation strategies in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders. Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Korea, 11, 41-52..
55. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press..
56. Statistics Korea. (2016). 2005, 2015 Population and Housing Census. http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/ statisticsListIndex.do?menuId= M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01..
57. Sun, X., Yan, M., & Chu, X. (2014). Passive mood and work behavior: The cross-level mediating effect of Zhong-Yong. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46, 1704-1718..
58. Twohig, M., Vilardaga, J., Levin, M., & Hayes, S. (2015). Changes in psychological flexibility during acceptance and commitment therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4, 196-202..
59. Tyndall, I., Waldeck, D., Pancani, L., Whelan, R., Roche, B., & Dawson, D. L. (2019). The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) as a measure of experiential avoidance: Concerns over discriminant validity. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 278-284..
60. Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Gordon, K. H., Bender, T. W., & Joiner Jr., T. E. (2008). Suicidal desire and the capability for suicide: Tests of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior among adults. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 76, 72-83..
61. Wang, P., & Yu, Y. (2014). A Review of the Relationship on Zhongyong Thinking and Innovation Intention. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities, and Management..
62. Wolgast, M. (2014). What does the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure?. Behavior Therapy, 45, 831-839..
63. World Health Organization. (2014). Mental health: a state of wellbeing. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/ mental_health/en/..
64. Wu, C., & Lin, Y. (2005). Development of a Zhong-yong thinking style scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 12, 247-299..
65. Yang, X., Zhang, P., Zhao, J., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Chen, Y., . . . Zhang, X. (2016). Confucian culture still matters: The benefits of Zhongyong Thinking (Doctrine of the Mean) for mental health. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1097-1113..
66. Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N., & Wang, L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 53-57..